WOWWWWWW!! Who says that Doctor Who is only for kids, eh??
I haven't been so excited by a first-of-series Doctor Who story since it was brought back in 2005. Which, come to think of it, isn't really that long I suppose, But HEY don't dampen the upswing that is my current mood after seeing the FIRST of Series 4 of Doctor Who starring Catherine Tate as Donna Noble alongside the ubiquotous Mr Tennant as the good Doc.
ALL SORTS of plot threads have been put before us and which should we take up first? Hmm, that's a tricky one. Perhaps we should first consider the episode itself.
Well, I have to say that the start of a new Doctor series is always a bit of a tenuous one. It has always been the Doctor and his coming together with yet another new companion. OK, so Donna Noble isn't strictly speaking NEW but she's a new full-timer. And at least she now moves off the "Almost Companions" list onto the fully paid members list!
The Noble return of Catherine Tate
I wasn't quite sure what role they had for her at the start. In "The Runaway Bride" Christmas episode of 2006, she was cast as a rather dippy, almost bimbo type who gets duped by the smart guy in league with our eight-legged friend the Empress of the Racnoss. Here in this episode we see her in a sharp suit, striding along on a mission ..... "investigating"! Yes, she used her previous short-lived job as Health & Safety Inspector (two days according to her mother) to get into the Adipose building to check out what is going on.
Amazing, isn't it, how one encounter with the Doctor can do that do a person! From dizzy secretary to inquisitive in-the-know investogator in what must be just a few months. Well, the time difference between the time they last met to now wasn't clear but it didn't seem to be so long. Maybe a year? Not sure, but since the memory of the Racnoss was still fresh in her mind, you could deduce it couldn't have been long.
She also mentioned a number of other things she had been aware of or had been investigating too. Maybe only from a reading point of view, but crop circles and UFO's were mentioned when they were on the roof. BUT something significant that she DID mention were "the bees". This must refer either to the Doctor Who episode much later in the series "The Unicorn And The Wasp" or to the Torchwood episode, "Reset", that I caught a few weeks back which was to do with giant mayfly and experiments at 'The Pharm' on people recovering from previously uncurable diseases. No, I too did not quite get the mayfly connection, but there was one and it may have some crossover potential to Doctor Who.
SO FUNNY though the moment when they first saw each other!! They had been kept apart quite comically for ages with their paths almost crossing on two or three occasions. Well, that part was classic comedy, but their final meeting was a classic moment. He, in window cleaner's cradle outside window. She, outside the door and looking through the 'Round Window'.
The Catherine Tate mime was BRILLIANT! On "Doctor Who Confidential" they said it had been left up to her how to do it in practice. From worded 'directions' on the script to the final result - a fantastically funny moment from a very funny lady!!
And when they finally met it was like they'd never been apart. She excited to see him and he just getting on with it all as normal. After he had rescued her from hanging outside, she came in and was angry at first and then just glad to see him. He of course reminded her that this is what it was all about with him!
Welcome back Donna Noble and welcome back Catherine Tate! I am SO looking forward to seeing her in action as the series goes on!!
And WHO WAS the Lady In Black?
I am very sure we haven't seen the last of the mysterious "Miss Foster" who was introduced to us today for a number of reasons. Firstly, there are none-too-concidental parallels with her and with The Master from the last series. Why? Well, obviously because of her being this 'enigmatic businesswoman' who said she had travelled far and wide until she found a species to use the Adipose 'birth' on. Yeah yeah - just like The Master and Toclafane. Next her Sonic Pen. Technology obviously NOT from planet Earth! And third (and last for now) the fact that we didn't actually see her dead on the ground. A sure sign that she will be "resurrected" .... or should I say ..... "regenerated".
Yes, there have been rumours a-plenty that The Rani will make a reappearance this series. Well, I must say that I did not see these two encounters with Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy. Wikipedia says that she was a woman, " whose villainy comes not from the usual variety of lust for power and suchlike, but from a mindset that treats everything (including morality) as secondary to her research", and that, "Her major interest is in tinkering with other species' biochemistry". I think you get the idea! It certainly was an experiement with humans and their biochemistry and the result of it was the birth of the Adipose children. In the Doctor Who episode she said she was, "hired by the Adipose parents to bring them up, 'like a nanny'".
We must not forget that right at the end of the previous series there is a mysterious female hand who takes the Master's ring from the fire with the sounds of evi laughter in the background. There is no way that was for nothing. Unless the Rani will carry over into the so-called 'Specials' that will take the place of Series 5 next year, there will SURELY be more to come. Will this be at the end of Series 4? That would be a likely place, though it would be a bit predictable. However, since there are also rumours of Ben Kingsley playing Davros in Series 4 (also see THIS STORY from DenofGeek.com), that doesn't leave a lot of scope for a Rani story AS WELL.
The seeds are sown for this series and the Specials next year ....
What is this 'Adipose' thing anyway?
No, for once it is not yet another Russell T Davies anagram! According to Wikpedia, "Adipose tissue or fat is loose connective tissue composed of adipocytes". And, "Adipocytes are the cells that primarily compose adipose tissue, specialized in storing energy as fat." In other words, adipose is body tissue that stores fat. Got it now? So it's not a made up sci-fi name after all!
Of course, we don't know WHAT the adipose children will turn out to be later ....
This brings me to another rumoured 'comeback kid' for Series 4. Now, you'll have to be a real hardened Doctor Who follower to remember the Axons from Jon Pertwee days and the story, "The Claws Of Axos". As the third Doctor left them, they were in a perpetual time loop. BUT these things can be broken out of - that is how sci-fi goes! The adipose were shown to also be capable of dissolving a whole human body if needed - tissue, fat, bones, the lot. Axons too needed to drain the life source of the whole planet including all life forms living there. Concidence? In the Doctor Who world, I don't believe in them!
The 'Yellow Girl' is back in .... time and space
One thousand points if you spotted my reference to ROSE TYLER from the name given her by the Sycorax in "The Christmas Invasion". Yes, there we were, episode over, enemy apparently defeated, The Doctor and Donna back safe in the Tardis. But, ah-HAH! NOT the end! Who should we see Donna talking to without knowing but our very own Rose Tyler!
I had seen the reports of her return but they said that Rose was to be back at the END of Series 4. But here in EPISODE ONE?? Never! And she just walks away and vanishes into thin air!
OK OK, she was working with the parallel Torchwood in the parallel universe and OK OK travel between parallel worlds is impossible. Yeah Yeah we KNOW that! BUT ...... ohh, RTD! To drop her in here at the end of Episode 1? PURE GENIUS! WHO would have suspected it??
Mr Davies, I know I was very rude about your ending to Series 3 and how naff I thought it was. I stand by those comments. However, you have truly redeemed yourself here and got me, for one, hooked on your line like a hungry shark after the fish-meal! WILL there be ANOTHER candid appearance by Rose? We will have to see.
So there you go, folks! Doctor Who Series 4 is finally UPON US! And don't you DARE be anywhere else except in front of your TV's for the next 12 weeks. OK??
Saturday 5 April 2008
Tuesday 1 January 2008
Doctor Who Christmas 2007 Voyage Of The Damned - Part 2 - Comment and Opinion
OK, I've just come away from the TV where I caught the last half of the story again.
I found that, even though I didn't see it the whole way through, I don't feel like I missed anything vital. And anyway, the most important bits to see were the sneak previews of Series 4 shown at the end.
So what did I think? And I would like to know YOUR opinion too.
I think I said before that most of what we saw was basically a good old-fashioned disaster movie with Doctor Who on top. Once we have got away from the fact that, yes, this is not the sea-version of the SS Titanic then we can relax a bit. Any attempt to make something out of the real thing would have been foolish I feel - although for most of the year THAT IS the storyline I was toying with in my mind. But it was good that in the first five minutes we put to rest both of those things that had troubled us all between Series 3 and now:-
The way it had been left at Series 3 end
QUESTION 1 - WHY has the Titanic crashed through the walls of the Tardis?
ANSWER - Because The Doctor was doing some maintenance work and had taken down the shields. This was reinforced in the Children In Need Special. Peter Davison's departing words were to remind The Doctor to put his defences back up. But erm ..... WHOOPS!
QUESTION 2 - What about the smashed-in Tardis walls now and repairs?
ANSWER - Obvious really. The Tardis being the all-powerful ship it is was able to pull away and repair itself and close the wall just like that. And then raise its shields and dematerialise inside the ship that had just crashed into it. Which was what would have happened had the shields been up in the first place.
Both of these worked for me with no sense that I'd been had. And I mean that most sincerely! REALLY I do!
OK, now what about the Voyage Of The Damned storyline?
Was it worthy of a Christmas Special? And was I glad I watched it? I said before, I don't think it compares well with the previous two. But yes, I definitely DID enjoy it. And I hope it is NOT the last we see of The Host Angels. A very menacing new enemy!
The Doctor's role in the story
Well, he said it himself at the start - whenever he wears that dinner jacket and bow-tie, it means trouble. And Trouble with a BIIIIG Capital T it was! OK, so his role was basically to save the remaining crew and passengers and along the way save the Earth and beat the Bad Guy. Yup, we can tick that little box. All done in the usual David Tennant way and very good he was too as always. Well ... apart from the bit near the end where Max Capricorn has been defeated and he needs a way to get to the ship's bridge fast. Erm, HOW to do it? Ah yes, The Host Angels had had their leader toasted so control had to pass to the next higher authority. Hmm WHO could that be? Well, don't think TOO LONG about it please! And a really quite CHEESY bit when those two Angels lifted The Doctor up and flew him all the way up back to the bridge. There were complaints from religious types about this, and although I am NOT one of those I do not feel it was necessary to do that sequence. But for the sake of speed, and with time runnning out and with the obvious appeal of the effect it created, yup, THAT was the way to go. Well, but as we know now from the end of the Master story in Series 3, The Doctor IS GOD! The kids may not have realised it yet but we grownups do!
Not sure, but this approach may well cause trouble for the BBC in the future. As I said, it doesn't matter much to me personally but DOES the BBC realy want to bring itself into conflict with religion and with the bishops and archbishops of this land? And more than this, if the BBC wants to promote this in the USA, then THEY won't take too kindly to this either!
But having saved the Titanic from its seemingly-inevitable crash landing, then AH HAH! YES, can the mighty Doctor save the life of Astrid Peth too? This would also increase the Cheese Rating to being Near Off The Scale. Thankfully they backed away from doing that. And it was good to see the frustration of the Great Doctor as he struggled in a kind of power-mad way to bring back Ms Minogue from the dead. Couldn't do it, kicked the machine screaming, "I can do ANYTHING!", in his annoyance. Well not quite.
I think there is a slight danger that we might get to a can-do-anything-I-like variety of Doctor Who. And this would really take away from the humour and human-like normality that IS what makes The Doctor's character so believable and great. It IS the fact that he doesn't come with any plan or any great powers except the mighty sonic screwdriver and his Tardis that really makes it all such a great thing to watch. If he became like The Fantastic Four all in one then WHO would be watching? No, you just leave him as he is please BBC!
The Buckingham Palace near-miss ending
Hmm ... did YOU find that funny? Well it did not amuse me much. And it brought to mind part of an interview David Tennant gave after the Christmas Special last year when he was asked which of London's famous landmarks he was going to trash next. Jokingly he replied that maybe the Palace might be a nice one to do. Well, hah hah Mr T. you nearly got your wish! Yes, we certainly know Russell T Davies's position on the Royal Family now! OK, it's funny to side-swipe Big Ben, it amuses us to smash all the glass in 'The Gherkin' in London and it WAS a hoot to drain The River Thames last year. But Buckingham Palace? Sorry but that would have been going WAY TOO FAR!
That subtle little back-reference from the storyline! Alonzee Alonzo .... allez!!
Now, you would have to know the Doctor Who series inside out to have spotted the 'Alonzo' reference. Yes, that was the first name of Midshipman Frame - the last man aive on the bridge who had been shot by Captain Hardaker at the beginning. So what of 'alonzo' then? Well, it's nothing much, but it came up in Series 2 and 'Army Of Ghosts' (episode 12).
So what's it all about? Some suggest that it is nothing more than a simple drinking game for adults. But the phrase, "Allons-y Alonzo", has come up twice now. If you know your French (and I didn't!), then this thread on the TV.com forum says it means simply, "Let's go, Alonzo!".
Nooo!! There HAS TO be more than that! But for now it will have to stay as it is.
BANG BANG he's .... NOT at all dead actually!
Look, OK, we're not in the wild wild west here and yes, I DO know it IS fiction. But the gun that Captain Hardaker used to shoot Midshipman Alonzo Frame with was not a small one. And basically - well, Mr Frame was left holding that area of his lower torso for the whole episode.
But there was NO BLOOD!!?? Not on his shirt, not on his hands, not anywhere visible!
Strikes me that this area of your body is likely to be one which contains quite a lot of the red stuff and not one you could be shot in and then competently still stay in the upright position and then attempt to operate the controls, communicate without problem and generally - well, carry on as normal.
No, I have never been shot in my life and don't wish to be either. But if you had a bullet in your body then BLOOD WOULD BE COMING OUT and you really WOULDN'T be able to stay conscious or upright for that long. Certainly NOT over an hour or longer if we assume that we were not operating in real time.
The abilities or lack of them that people have after having been shot are extremely flexible on TV and they always have been. But C'MON! Let's get real guys! He SHOULD have been dead! No blood on his hands either!!
The 'fat guys' - Morvin and Foon Van Hoff
Hehe it was good to see another act of defiance by RTD in having these two in the story. Well, I mean after all this the government has been banging on this year at us that we must WATCH WHAT WE EAT and that OBESITY IS SUCH A BIG PROBLEM IN THE UK.
I thought they were really great and it was sad that they got killed off so soon even though then went down fighting. But there were numerous fat references in the initial escape from the Angels. Well, I mean things like that they were too big to get through the gaps and stuff. But they were two brilliant and very loveable characters and it was great that they had won the trip through some kind of phone-in competition which Foon admitted later she had spent something like 5000 credits (or some other very large number) on to get the win.
And I loved the way that The Doctor sat with them at the start and made the champagne go off in the faces of the pompous gits on the next table who were sneering at them. The Lonely Traveller with the Lonely Travellers!
Bananafalata - no, Bannakalatafka, NOOOOO!!!! WHAT was his name again?
We haven't had a toungue-twister since Eccleston days so it was only right that we SHOULD have one again. And WHAT a twister it was!! Bannakaffalatta, the cyborg midget who saved them all! It's one of those little writer's jokes isn't it to put in an unpronounceable name for your Star Cast to deal with! Eccleston, Piper and company had to wrestle with theirs so it was only fair that Mr Tennant, Ms Minogue and company should have one too. BRILLIANT! But WHY did he have to die too?
The other tongue-twister I am referring to, of course, is, "Raxicoricophalabitorious" (and I had to look that up and copy-and-paste it!!) and it was the Slitheen's home planet from Series 1 and, later, from the Sarah Jane Adventures.
A LOT of dead bodies for a single Doctor Who episode!
No, I don't mean all those unseen Titanic passenger passengers and crew personnel. But of those who started out on the story with The Doctor, so few remained. Once the Host Angels death halos had been revealed to us, then All Hell was to break loose (some kind of pun there I think).
First there was the unknown crew member who was the first to taste the halo's cutting power. Just to introduce it. But then we had the unnecessary and early death of Morvin Van Hoof who trod on something he shouldn't and fell down to be toasted by the engines. He was followed by cyborg Bannakaffalatta who didn't actually die except when he zapped the Host Angels with his EMP device and so drained his own power source completely. Then, still crossing that 'bridge' we had Foon Van Hoof who actually died to save them all by roping the Angel and jumping off pulling the Angel down too.
"No More!", the Doctor declared, and so it was until the very end when Astrid Peth also gave her life and that of a fork-lift truck to push Max Capricorn down to that green-screen ending which we know well.
I know Doctor Who is all about 'Death And Destruction', but this beats the other two Christmas Specials by some distance for the number of starring cast members who met their end. Am I right?
I found that, even though I didn't see it the whole way through, I don't feel like I missed anything vital. And anyway, the most important bits to see were the sneak previews of Series 4 shown at the end.
So what did I think? And I would like to know YOUR opinion too.
I think I said before that most of what we saw was basically a good old-fashioned disaster movie with Doctor Who on top. Once we have got away from the fact that, yes, this is not the sea-version of the SS Titanic then we can relax a bit. Any attempt to make something out of the real thing would have been foolish I feel - although for most of the year THAT IS the storyline I was toying with in my mind. But it was good that in the first five minutes we put to rest both of those things that had troubled us all between Series 3 and now:-
The way it had been left at Series 3 end
QUESTION 1 - WHY has the Titanic crashed through the walls of the Tardis?
ANSWER - Because The Doctor was doing some maintenance work and had taken down the shields. This was reinforced in the Children In Need Special. Peter Davison's departing words were to remind The Doctor to put his defences back up. But erm ..... WHOOPS!
QUESTION 2 - What about the smashed-in Tardis walls now and repairs?
ANSWER - Obvious really. The Tardis being the all-powerful ship it is was able to pull away and repair itself and close the wall just like that. And then raise its shields and dematerialise inside the ship that had just crashed into it. Which was what would have happened had the shields been up in the first place.
Both of these worked for me with no sense that I'd been had. And I mean that most sincerely! REALLY I do!
OK, now what about the Voyage Of The Damned storyline?
Was it worthy of a Christmas Special? And was I glad I watched it? I said before, I don't think it compares well with the previous two. But yes, I definitely DID enjoy it. And I hope it is NOT the last we see of The Host Angels. A very menacing new enemy!
The Doctor's role in the story
Well, he said it himself at the start - whenever he wears that dinner jacket and bow-tie, it means trouble. And Trouble with a BIIIIG Capital T it was! OK, so his role was basically to save the remaining crew and passengers and along the way save the Earth and beat the Bad Guy. Yup, we can tick that little box. All done in the usual David Tennant way and very good he was too as always. Well ... apart from the bit near the end where Max Capricorn has been defeated and he needs a way to get to the ship's bridge fast. Erm, HOW to do it? Ah yes, The Host Angels had had their leader toasted so control had to pass to the next higher authority. Hmm WHO could that be? Well, don't think TOO LONG about it please! And a really quite CHEESY bit when those two Angels lifted The Doctor up and flew him all the way up back to the bridge. There were complaints from religious types about this, and although I am NOT one of those I do not feel it was necessary to do that sequence. But for the sake of speed, and with time runnning out and with the obvious appeal of the effect it created, yup, THAT was the way to go. Well, but as we know now from the end of the Master story in Series 3, The Doctor IS GOD! The kids may not have realised it yet but we grownups do!
Not sure, but this approach may well cause trouble for the BBC in the future. As I said, it doesn't matter much to me personally but DOES the BBC realy want to bring itself into conflict with religion and with the bishops and archbishops of this land? And more than this, if the BBC wants to promote this in the USA, then THEY won't take too kindly to this either!
But having saved the Titanic from its seemingly-inevitable crash landing, then AH HAH! YES, can the mighty Doctor save the life of Astrid Peth too? This would also increase the Cheese Rating to being Near Off The Scale. Thankfully they backed away from doing that. And it was good to see the frustration of the Great Doctor as he struggled in a kind of power-mad way to bring back Ms Minogue from the dead. Couldn't do it, kicked the machine screaming, "I can do ANYTHING!", in his annoyance. Well not quite.
I think there is a slight danger that we might get to a can-do-anything-I-like variety of Doctor Who. And this would really take away from the humour and human-like normality that IS what makes The Doctor's character so believable and great. It IS the fact that he doesn't come with any plan or any great powers except the mighty sonic screwdriver and his Tardis that really makes it all such a great thing to watch. If he became like The Fantastic Four all in one then WHO would be watching? No, you just leave him as he is please BBC!
The Buckingham Palace near-miss ending
Hmm ... did YOU find that funny? Well it did not amuse me much. And it brought to mind part of an interview David Tennant gave after the Christmas Special last year when he was asked which of London's famous landmarks he was going to trash next. Jokingly he replied that maybe the Palace might be a nice one to do. Well, hah hah Mr T. you nearly got your wish! Yes, we certainly know Russell T Davies's position on the Royal Family now! OK, it's funny to side-swipe Big Ben, it amuses us to smash all the glass in 'The Gherkin' in London and it WAS a hoot to drain The River Thames last year. But Buckingham Palace? Sorry but that would have been going WAY TOO FAR!
That subtle little back-reference from the storyline! Alonzee Alonzo .... allez!!
Now, you would have to know the Doctor Who series inside out to have spotted the 'Alonzo' reference. Yes, that was the first name of Midshipman Frame - the last man aive on the bridge who had been shot by Captain Hardaker at the beginning. So what of 'alonzo' then? Well, it's nothing much, but it came up in Series 2 and 'Army Of Ghosts' (episode 12).
So what's it all about? Some suggest that it is nothing more than a simple drinking game for adults. But the phrase, "Allons-y Alonzo", has come up twice now. If you know your French (and I didn't!), then this thread on the TV.com forum says it means simply, "Let's go, Alonzo!".
Nooo!! There HAS TO be more than that! But for now it will have to stay as it is.
BANG BANG he's .... NOT at all dead actually!
Look, OK, we're not in the wild wild west here and yes, I DO know it IS fiction. But the gun that Captain Hardaker used to shoot Midshipman Alonzo Frame with was not a small one. And basically - well, Mr Frame was left holding that area of his lower torso for the whole episode.
But there was NO BLOOD!!?? Not on his shirt, not on his hands, not anywhere visible!
Strikes me that this area of your body is likely to be one which contains quite a lot of the red stuff and not one you could be shot in and then competently still stay in the upright position and then attempt to operate the controls, communicate without problem and generally - well, carry on as normal.
No, I have never been shot in my life and don't wish to be either. But if you had a bullet in your body then BLOOD WOULD BE COMING OUT and you really WOULDN'T be able to stay conscious or upright for that long. Certainly NOT over an hour or longer if we assume that we were not operating in real time.
The abilities or lack of them that people have after having been shot are extremely flexible on TV and they always have been. But C'MON! Let's get real guys! He SHOULD have been dead! No blood on his hands either!!
The 'fat guys' - Morvin and Foon Van Hoff
Hehe it was good to see another act of defiance by RTD in having these two in the story. Well, I mean after all this the government has been banging on this year at us that we must WATCH WHAT WE EAT and that OBESITY IS SUCH A BIG PROBLEM IN THE UK.
I thought they were really great and it was sad that they got killed off so soon even though then went down fighting. But there were numerous fat references in the initial escape from the Angels. Well, I mean things like that they were too big to get through the gaps and stuff. But they were two brilliant and very loveable characters and it was great that they had won the trip through some kind of phone-in competition which Foon admitted later she had spent something like 5000 credits (or some other very large number) on to get the win.
And I loved the way that The Doctor sat with them at the start and made the champagne go off in the faces of the pompous gits on the next table who were sneering at them. The Lonely Traveller with the Lonely Travellers!
Bananafalata - no, Bannakalatafka, NOOOOO!!!! WHAT was his name again?
We haven't had a toungue-twister since Eccleston days so it was only right that we SHOULD have one again. And WHAT a twister it was!! Bannakaffalatta, the cyborg midget who saved them all! It's one of those little writer's jokes isn't it to put in an unpronounceable name for your Star Cast to deal with! Eccleston, Piper and company had to wrestle with theirs so it was only fair that Mr Tennant, Ms Minogue and company should have one too. BRILLIANT! But WHY did he have to die too?
The other tongue-twister I am referring to, of course, is, "Raxicoricophalabitorious" (and I had to look that up and copy-and-paste it!!) and it was the Slitheen's home planet from Series 1 and, later, from the Sarah Jane Adventures.
A LOT of dead bodies for a single Doctor Who episode!
No, I don't mean all those unseen Titanic passenger passengers and crew personnel. But of those who started out on the story with The Doctor, so few remained. Once the Host Angels death halos had been revealed to us, then All Hell was to break loose (some kind of pun there I think).
First there was the unknown crew member who was the first to taste the halo's cutting power. Just to introduce it. But then we had the unnecessary and early death of Morvin Van Hoof who trod on something he shouldn't and fell down to be toasted by the engines. He was followed by cyborg Bannakaffalatta who didn't actually die except when he zapped the Host Angels with his EMP device and so drained his own power source completely. Then, still crossing that 'bridge' we had Foon Van Hoof who actually died to save them all by roping the Angel and jumping off pulling the Angel down too.
"No More!", the Doctor declared, and so it was until the very end when Astrid Peth also gave her life and that of a fork-lift truck to push Max Capricorn down to that green-screen ending which we know well.
I know Doctor Who is all about 'Death And Destruction', but this beats the other two Christmas Specials by some distance for the number of starring cast members who met their end. Am I right?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)